• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
    第六届编委会
  • 投稿须知
    文章要求
    投稿指南
    发表学术论文“五不准”
  • 本刊稿约
  • 期刊公告
  • 联系我们
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】     【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 283次   下载 0次  
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
腰椎动态关节松动术结合PNF技术对腰椎小关节紊乱的疗效观察
贾程森1,2, 刘沙鑫
1.四川大学华西医院康复医学科 2.四川大学华西临床医学院毕业后继续教育
摘要:
【摘要】目的:观察腰椎动态关节松动术(Mulligan)结合PNF(Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation)技术对腰椎小关节紊乱的疗效观察。方法:将52名腰椎小关节紊乱的患者随机分为试验组和对照组各26例,两组都分别采用徒手腰椎动态关节松动技术(Mulligan),试验组同时增加PNF技术来增加躯干核心肌群与骨盆周围肌群稳定。两组均隔日治疗1次,共治疗 3次。每次治疗前采用Oswestry腰痛残疾问卷ODI(The Oswestry Disability Index)[[[]Fairbank J C, Pynsent P B. The Oswestry Disability Index.[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(22):2940.]]及治疗前、后采用视觉模拟评分法VAS(Visual Analogue Scale)评定治疗效果。结果:每位患者经过1周三次的治疗后,两组 VAS评分及ODI值均较治疗前明显下降(P<0.05),且试验组干预前后的差值更大((P<0.05),患者的疼痛症状明显缓解,其日常活动能力提高。结论:采用腰椎动态关节松动(Mulligan)结合PNF技术对腰椎小关节紊乱的疗效观察效果显著。明显优于徒手腰椎动态关节松动技术(Mulligan)。
关键词:  腰椎小关节紊乱,腰椎动态关节松动技术(Mulligan),PNF技术。
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:四川省科技厅支撑项目2018FZ0114
Clinical observation of Mulligan's mobilization with PNF technique for lumbar facet joint pain
Abstract:
Abstract Objective: This study was conducted to examine the influence of combined exercise using proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and Mulligan Mobilization Technique. Methods: Fifty-two participants with Lumbar facet joint syndrome were randomly divided into 2 groups. The study group(aged 47.92 ± 14.96, 14men, 12women) received a conventional physical therapy program consisted of stretching and strengthening exercises plus SNAG (based on the Mulligan concept) on the affected lumbar levels, and the control group (aged 48.92 ± 13.59, 12 men, 14 women) received the same conventional program 3 times per week for 1 week. PNF technique was added to the control group to increase the stability of trunk core muscle group and peripelvic muscle group. Outcome measures were pain and function measured by visual analog scale, and the Oswestry Disability Index. Measurements were recorded before and after the end of the treatment period. Result: After three times a week, the VAS score and ODI value of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.05). Besides, adding PNF to the conventional program resulted in higher improvement in terms of pain and function (P?<0.05) respectively. Conclusion: This preliminary study indicated improvement in both groups. Mulligan mobilization technique combined with PNF technique is obviously superior to the Mulligan mobilization technique.
Key words:  Key words: Lumbar facet joint syndrome,Mulligan,proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF)。
您是本站第  88328630  位访问者!蜀ICP备11024768号
版权所有:(C)四川省医疗卫生服务指导中心 2010 CopyRight http://scmj.scyx.org.cn/ all right reserved.
地址:成都市玉林南街2号附3号   电话:028-86136765 邮编:610041
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司