• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
    第六届编委会
  • 投稿须知
    文章要求
    投稿指南
    发表学术论文“五不准”
  • 本刊稿约
  • 期刊公告
  • 联系我们
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】     【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2336次   下载 0次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
桡动脉不同穿刺方法采血效果的比较研究
黄静;杨玲;李荟樱;谭明英;
四川大学华西医院门诊部
摘要:
目的探讨桡动脉不同穿刺方法的成功率及患者疼痛感比较,为临床选择最佳方法提供参考。方法我院2017年3至4月骨科住院患者180例行整体抽样,按入院先后分成A、B、C三组,每组60例。A组采用改良桡动脉穿刺法,B组采用反向桡动脉穿刺法,C组采用手掌背曲垂直进针法。均对桡动脉进行血气采血,比较其一次穿刺成功率及患者疼痛感受。结果三种桡动脉穿刺方法在采血一次成功率、患者疼痛感觉和穿刺顺利程度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论改良桡动脉穿刺法效果优于反向桡动脉穿刺法和手掌背曲垂直进针法。
关键词:  桡动脉  穿刺方法  成功率疼痛感
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
A Comparison Study on Blood Sampling Effect of Different Puncture Methods of Radial Artery
Huang Jing;Yang Ling;Li Huiying
Outpatient Department of West China Hospital
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the success rates of different puncture methods of radial artery and compare relative pain of patients,in order to give a reference to clinical selection of the best method. Methods 180 patients admitted to our Orthopedic from March 2017 to April 2017 were randomly sampled and divided into 3 groups( A,B and C) according to their admission order with each group having 30 cases. Group A accepted modified radial artery puncture while group B accepted reverse radial artery puncture while group C accepted vertical insertion of dorsal palm. The blood gas sampling was performed on radial artery and the success rate of disposable puncture and the pain perception of the patients were compared. Results The comparison among the three groups had significant differences in the success rate of disposable blood sampling,pain perception of the patients and smoothness of puncture( P<0. 05). Conclusion modified radial artery puncture has a better effect than reverse radial artery puncture or vertical insertion of dorsal palm
Key words:  radialartery  puncturemethod  successrate  painsensation
您是本站第  88070508  位访问者!蜀ICP备11024768号
版权所有:(C)四川省医疗卫生服务指导中心 2010 CopyRight http://scmj.scyx.org.cn/ all right reserved.
地址:成都市玉林南街2号附3号   电话:028-86136765 邮编:610041
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司